When it comes to establishing "actual malice," showing knowledge that the statement is false or reckless disregard of the truth both play a key role, she added. "Strongest defamation case I can remember": Expert says filing shows "Dominion has all the receipts" ![]() "It's very rare, in a case against the media, that you're going to have this quantity of evidence, that they knew what they were putting out there was false." ![]() "It's really kind of remarkable, the quantity of evidence tending to show knowledge or recklessness in this case," Lyrissa Lidsky, a constitutional law professor at the University of Florida, told Salon. Internal messages also showed that top hosts, including Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, derided the stolen election claims in private text messages but continued to air them in an effort to keep viewers from turning their attention to competing networks. Chairman Rupert Murdoch acknowledged in his deposition that some hosts "endorsed" false claims. Discovery into Fox has proven that from the top of the organization to the bottom, Fox always knew the absurdity of the Dominion 'stolen election' story," Dominion said in the filing. "Despite having conceded it was all a lie, and despite internal documents proving they knew it was a lie all along, Fox still will not retract the lies and tell its audience the truth," the company's lawyers added.įox Corp. "This concession should come as no surprise. Dominion Voting Systems on Wednesday asked a judge to issue a ruling in its $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News before next month's scheduled trial after submitting evidence showing that Fox hosts and executives knew the TrumpWorld election lies they aired were false.ĭominion asked the judge to decide the case in its favor, arguing that Fox News had "produced no evidence – none, zero – supporting those lies."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |